Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Project Management SaaS Retention Analysis
Interprets weekly retention data for a B2B SaaS product, identifying below-benchmark activation as the primary issue and providing prioritized action recommendations.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Week 1: 50%, Week 2: 38%, Week 3: 30%. We’re a project management SaaS at $49/month targeting small teams.
Output
What the skill generates for you
Cohort Analysis Interpretation
Overall Assessment: BELOW BENCHMARK - CRITICAL ACTIVATION PROBLEM
Your Week 1 retention of 50% is 10-20 percentage points below industry standards for B2B SaaS at your price point. The ongoing drop (50% → 30% by Week 3) suggests both activation and engagement issues.
Benchmark Comparison
| Metric | Your Performance | B2B SMB SaaS Benchmark | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 Retention | 50% | 60-70% | -10 to -20% |
| Week 3 Retention | 30% | ~50% (est.) | -20% |
| Week 0 to Week 1 Drop | 50% | 30-40% | -10 to -20% worse |
| Week 1 to Week 3 Drop | 20% | ~15% | -5% worse |
Key Insights
1. First-Week Churn is Catastrophic
You lose 50% of users in the first week. For a $49/month paid product targeting small teams, this is alarming:
- Users are paying but not experiencing value quickly enough
- Onboarding likely doesn’t guide teams to their first “win”
- Setup friction may be too high (no team invitation? No project created?)
Action: This is your highest-leverage problem. Fix Week 1 retention before anything else.
2. Continuing Erosion Through Week 3
Even users who survive Week 1 continue dropping at ~10% per week:
- Week 1 → Week 2: 12 percentage point drop (24% relative decline)
- Week 2 → Week 3: 8 percentage point drop (21% relative decline)
This suggests:
- Habit formation isn’t happening
- Users aren’t seeing ongoing value
- No engagement hooks bringing them back
For project management tools, this often means: projects aren’t being updated, teams aren’t collaborating, tasks aren’t being completed.
3. No Stabilization Visible Yet
Typical SaaS curves flatten by Week 4-6 when you’ve found your “core retained cohort.” At only 30% retention by Week 3, you likely haven’t stabilized yet. Your long-term retention floor could be as low as 15-20%.
Implication: Only 1 in 5 paying customers may become long-term users. At $49/month, this severely limits LTV and CAC tolerance.
Recommended Next Steps
Immediate (This Week):
- Identify activated users: What do the 30% who stayed through Week 3 have in common? (Projects created? Team invited? Tasks completed?)
- Survey Week 1 churners: “What prevented you from getting value from [Product]?”
- Analyze first-week behavior: Compare retained vs. churned - which features did survivors use?
Short-Term (Next 2 Weeks):
- Define activation metric: E.g., “Created project + Invited team member + Completed 3 tasks in Week 1”
- Reduce time-to-first-value: Can users see a working project board in 5 minutes instead of 30?
- Add Week 1 engagement triggers:
- Day 2: “Quick win” email with template projects
- Day 4: Team collaboration prompt
- Day 7: Feature discovery nudge
Medium-Term (Next Month):
- A/B test onboarding flows: Test guided setup vs. self-serve
- Target 65%+ Week 1 retention: Benchmark-level performance
- Add viral loop: Make team invitation core to activation (Slack/Trello model)
- Implement engagement scoring: Predict churn risk, intervene early
Segmentation Suggestions
Breaking down your aggregate retention by these dimensions will reveal hidden patterns:
| Dimension | Why It Matters | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| Team Size | Single users vs. teams have vastly different retention | Do multi-user accounts retain 2-3x better? |
| Signup Source | Channel quality varies (organic vs. paid ads) | Which sources deliver teams vs. solo users? |
| Activation Status | Validates your activation metric | How much better do “activated” users retain? (Should be 2-3x) |
| First Project Type | Entry point predicts value perception | Do users starting with templates retain better? |
| Invite Timing | Team products need teams | Do users who invite teammates in Week 1 retain 3x better? |
| Plan Type | If offering trial | Do trial-to-paid converts retain differently than direct purchases? |
Financial Implications
At $49/month with 30% Week 3 retention (assuming ~20% stabilization):
- Expected 12-month LTV: ~$117 (20% × $49 × 12)
- Maximum viable CAC (3:1 LTV:CAC): ~$39
- Reality check: If your CAC is higher than $30-35, you’re losing money on each customer
If you improve Week 1 to 65% (and Week 3 to 45% accordingly):
- Expected 12-month LTV: ~$220 (45% × $49 × 12 × 0.8)
- Maximum viable CAC: ~$73
- Impact: 2x increase in sustainable CAC, unlocking growth channels
Summary
Verdict: Your retention is significantly below benchmark, indicating a critical activation problem. Users are paying but leaving before experiencing value. The pattern suggests:
- Onboarding doesn’t drive activation
- Product doesn’t create habits in first 2 weeks
- Team collaboration (the stickiness driver for PM tools) isn’t happening
Primary Recommendation: Obsess over Week 1 activation. Identify what the 30% who stayed did differently, codify it as your activation metric, and redesign onboarding to drive that behavior. For PM tools, this typically means: “Created project + Invited team + Completed collaborative task.” Until Week 1 retention reaches 65%+, all other optimization is secondary.
About This Skill
Interpret SaaS cohort retention data with benchmark comparisons, trend analysis, and actionable recommendations to improve user retention.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
B2C Channel Quality Comparison
Compares retention by acquisition channel for a B2C subscription app, calculates LTV multiples, and provides clear prioritization recommendations.
B2B Analytics Tool with Improving Trend
Analyzes multiple cohorts to identify improving retention trends, connects changes to recent onboarding redesign, and provides mid-market B2B benchmarks.